Posts

Showing posts from August, 2017

Blog Stage 5

There is a website called “ Impeach Trump Now ” that I came across while doing research for Participation Topic #3. This website is a petition that allows anyone to sign it in order to help impeach President Trump. The petition is a call upon Congress to call on the House to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of President Donald John Trump. According to the website, currently 1,155,176 people have signed the petition.  The website is very well organized, and it is run by a legal advisory board of very impressive individuals from prominent law schools, such as Harvard Law School, and judges from high courts. According to the website, President Trump is in violation of the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses stated in the United States Constitution because of his refusal to divest from his business interests.  Until now, I had no idea there was probable cause for Trump’s impeachment. I’m surprised that his comments on twitter alone aren’t worth

Nothing Trumps Obamacare Response

I came across a very insightful blog called “ Nothing Trumps Obamacare ” by one of my classmates, Kelly La, about the new Trump-Care bill’s elimination of coverage for those with ‘pre-existing conditions.’ The Trump-Care allows states to “opt out of offering plans that cover essential health care benefits that people with pre-existing conditions need.”  Kelly does a great job explaining the dangers this bill will have on the American public through her words. The way she lays out the facts and her opinions is very effective in explaining her argument. She weaves them together seamlessly to make her point witty and quick. The best example of this is in this sentence written by Kelly: “People don’t realize that as many as 1 in every 2 Americans have a health issue that qualifies as a pre existing condition.”  However, the most compelling tactic Kelly uses to explain her argument is the huge image in the middle of her blog post. The image lists the ‘pre-existing conditions’ and h

New Hampshire vs. Trump

The Washington Post published a January 27th phone call transcript between President Trump and President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico. In this transcript, it was revealed that President Trump had called the state of New Hampshire “a drug-infested den”. The transcript also quotes Trump stretching the truth about his wins during campaigning for the presidency in New Hampshire. Trump states in this transcript “I won New Hampshire because New Hampshire is a drug infested den”.  These revelations have sparked New Hampshire politicians and residents to criticize Trump and his words regarding the state. New Hampshire is mainly frustrated with two parts of Trump’s statements in this transcript. One of which being his poor description of the state, and the other being that he did not win New Hampshire in the general election, only in the Republican primary.  The Governor of New Hampshire, Chris Sununu, made a statement on the issue and said that “[Trump’s] mischaracterization of this e